Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Intel Pentium Bug
From: dgaudet-list-bugtraq () ARCTIC ORG (Dean Gaudet)
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 19:27:49 -0800
Just an idle thought ... since this instruction includes the LOCK prefix perhaps the processor dies while still signalling LOCK... maybe a modified watchdog card could notice this situation and generate an NMI, yadda yadda. Dean
Current thread:
- WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug ZombieMan (Nov 06)
- Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug Stefan Hudson (Nov 07)
- Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug whiz (Nov 07)
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug George Imburgia (Nov 07)
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug Kragen \ (Nov 07)
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug Chris Pascoe (Nov 07)
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug Stefan Hudson (Nov 07)
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug Aleph One (Nov 07)
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug Eric Allman (Nov 07)
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug Dean Gaudet (Nov 07)
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug Dean Gaudet (Nov 07)
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug Colin Jenkins (Nov 07)
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug George Imburgia (Nov 07)
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug Travis Hassloch (Nov 11)
- Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug Stefan Hudson (Nov 07)
- Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug Roger Espel Llima (Nov 09)
- Re: solaris (fwd) Corey Lindsly (Nov 09)
- Re: solaris (fwd) James Lockwood (Nov 09)
- Re: solaris (fwd) Dalvenjah FoxFire (Nov 09)