Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Vulnrability in all known Linux distributions
From: sopwith () redhat com (Elliot Lee)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 11:36:30 -0400
On Tue, 13 Aug 1996, Alan Brown wrote:
On Tue, 13 Aug 1996, Steve Czetty wrote:The problem in this case happens to be in the libc implementation of realpath(), so I plan to post a patch against libc 5.3.12 shortly as well, andThe current libc is 5.3.18, a patch against this would be better. :)
I think you are confusing 5.2.18 and 5.3.12. Here's the rundown: - 5.2.18 is an older, but still widely used, libc. - 5.3.12 is the latest release (i.e. "stable") libc. - 5.4.4 is the latest beta/development libc. Any solutions to the libc problem would definitely be appreciated :-) Hope this helps, --==== Elliot Lee = <sopwith () redhat com> == Red Hat Software ====-- "Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea; massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." [Note to Mod: We will be releasing a security fix for the mount problem as soon as possible; I can announce it on here as well as on the redhat-announce-list, if that would be appropriate...?]
Current thread:
- Re: IRIX 5.3 chost, (continued)
- Re: IRIX 5.3 chost Vern Hart (Aug 12)
- Re: IRIX 5.3 chost Mike Kienenberger (Aug 12)
- mail storm Dan Stromberg (Aug 12)
- Re: mail storm Dan Stromberg (Aug 12)
- Re: mail storm Arik Baratz (Aug 13)
- Re: mail storm Albert Lunde (Aug 12)
- Re: mail storm Igor Chudov @ home (Aug 12)
- Vulnrability in all known Linux distributions bloodmask (Aug 12)
- Re: Vulnrability in all known Linux distributions Steve Czetty (Aug 13)
- Re: Vulnrability in all known Linux distributions Alan Brown (Aug 13)
- Re: Vulnrability in all known Linux distributions Elliot Lee (Aug 13)
- Re: Vulnrability in all known Linux distributions Alan Cox (Aug 14)
- Re: IRIX 5.3 chost Vern Hart (Aug 12)
- mount/umount realpath() buffer overflow David J. Meltzer (Aug 13)
- Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload bloodmask (Aug 12)
- Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload Digital Dreamer (Aug 12)
- Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload Casper Dik (Aug 13)
- Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload Mike Acar (Aug 13)
- Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload Elliot Lee (Aug 13)
- why suid mount (was Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, Bryan Reece (Aug 13)
- Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload Christopher Masto (Aug 14)
- Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload Brian Tao (Aug 15)