Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail)
From: dugsong () umich edu (Douglas Song)
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 1996 18:06:11 -0400
On Thu, 8 Aug 1996, Sam Quigley wrote:
As I see it, to create a system like this, we need a new adduser script; other than this, each program that is to be enabled or disabled (chsh, procmail, etc.) needs modification... Assuming that there is not already a system like this in place, I'd like to volunteer to draft a standard and proof-of-concept set of tools.
Seems to me you could accomplish this with the existing PAM API - see http://gluon.physics.ucla.edu/~morgan/pam/ for info. But I digress. Send mail to pam-list-request () redhat com to subscribe to a more appropriate list for this discussion... --- Douglas Song dugsong@{umich.edu,monkey.org} University of Michigan ITD GPCC Unix Services www: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~dugsong keyid: C2263445 fingerprint: BF F5 20 EA DA 2F C4 F4 7D 68 4A 50 E4 35 D1 17
Current thread:
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail, (continued)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail Junya Ho (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail Shaun Lowry (Aug 09)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail Junya Ho (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Rob Payne (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Eugene Bradley (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Todd Vierling (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Julian Assange (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Theo de Raadt (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Sam Quigley (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) W Lee Nussbaum (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Douglas Song (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Adam Bauer (Aug 08)