Bugtraq mailing list archives
unsubscribe bugtraq parkerm@cs49.holloman
From: ParkerM () cs49 holloman af mil (ParkerM,TSgt,49CS/SCSC)
Date: Tue, 09 May 95 07:50:00 PDT
---------- From: dan Subject: Returned mail: Subject unknown Date: Tuesday, May 09, 1995 2:52AM Hello from the Machine, your subject wasn't precise enough to put your mail in The queue. ----- Message body -----
From owner-bugtraq () fc net Tue May 9 02:52:11 1995
Received: from sprawl.fc.net (sprawl.fc.net [198.6.198.6]) by mendel.sis.pasteur.fr (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id CAA14064; Tue, 9 May 1995 02:52:09 +0200 Received: from freeside.fc.net (freeside.fc.net [198.6.198.2]) by sprawl.fc.net (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id PAA16801 for <bugtraq-outgoing () sprawl fc net>; Mon, 8 May 1995 15:26:38 -0500 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freeside.fc.net (8.6.8.1/8.6.6) id PAA09634 for bugtraq-outgoing; Mon, 8 May 1995 15:28:42 -0500 Received: from ns.holloman.af.mil (DNS.HOLLOMAN.AF.MIL [132.5.72.10]) by freeside.fc.net (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id PAA09622 for <bugtraq () fc net>; Mon, 8 May 1995 15:28:34 -0500 Received: from gateway2.holloman.af.mil by ns.holloman.af.mil with smtp Sender: owner-bugtraq () fc net Precedence: bulk (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #5) id m0s8RJo-00007EC; Mon, 8 May 95 11:49 GMT Received: by gateway2.holloman.af.mil with Microsoft Mail id <2FAE8D24 () gateway2 holloman af mil>; Mon, 08 May 95 14:29:08 PDT From: "ParkerM,TSgt,49CS/SCSC" <ParkerM () cs49 holloman af mil> To: "'smtp:bugtraq () fc net'" <bugtraq () fc net> Date: Mon, 08 May 95 12:45:00 PDT Message-ID: <2FAE8D24 () gateway2 holloman af mil> Encoding: 2 TEXT X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0 unsubscribe bugtraq parkerm@cs49.holloman
Current thread:
- Re: impossible vs. impractical, (continued)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Mike O'Connor (May 10)
- password backdoors System Admin (May 10)
- Error in the Lorenz-Fitzgerald assumption. A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security (May 10)
- Re: password backdoors Nathan Lawson (May 10)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Perry E. Metzger (May 10)
- and now, back to your regularly scheduled discussion topic... robert owen thomas (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Aleph One (May 08)
- R. Thomas's NFS question PETER.T.WHITING () sprint sprint com (May 09)
- Re: R. Thomas's NFS question Marek Michalkiewicz (May 10)
- RE: Anon site needed for FIP[S] PUB 190 Lawrence E. Bassham (May 09)
- unsubscribe bugtraq parkerm@cs49.holloman ParkerM,TSgt,49CS/SCSC (May 09)
- Please, please, _please_ (was Re: impossible vs. impractical) G.J.W. Hagenaars (May 08)
- Re: Please, please, _please_ (was Re: impossible vs. impractical) ATM_Feel_the_Power (May 09)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical John F. Haugh II (May 10)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Tom Ptacek (May 14)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical jon (May 14)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Tom Ptacek (May 14)