Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Request for discussion.
From: proff () suburbia apana org au (Julian Assange)
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 20:44:18 +1100 (EST)
Oh and dont forget the pagedaemon :-) ps could run without privileges as well if we made /dev/kmem and /dev/drum (or whatever) 644... Now theres an improvement. (Any ultrix people reading this? :-)ps can already run without priveledges. mount -t procfs /dev/kmem /proc Assuming you use a "Real OS(tm)" ;-)On what OS? Isnt it the case that ps's on these /proc systems often need to run setuid root, so that than can ioctl(2) everyone's processes?
Not if "Real OS(tm)" == Linux. (which of course has the best procfs money can't buy). Proff
Current thread:
- Re: Request for discussion., (continued)
- Re: Request for discussion. Karl Strickland (Feb 06)
- Re: Request for discussion. Timothy Newsham (Feb 06)
- Re: Request for discussion. Karl Strickland (Feb 06)
- Re: Request for discussion. Casper Dik (Feb 07)
- Re: Request for discussion. Timothy Newsham (Feb 07)
- Possible backdoor in ftpd? James Seng (Feb 07)
- Re: Request for discussion. Karl Strickland (Feb 06)
- Re: Request for discussion. Stephen D. Williams (Feb 07)
- Re: Request for discussion. Aleph One (Feb 07)
- Re: Request for discussion. Julian Assange (Feb 08)
- Re: Request for discussion. Casper Dik (Feb 08)
- Re: Request for discussion. Karl Strickland (Feb 08)
- Re: Request for discussion. Casper Dik (Feb 08)
- Sniffer FAQ Christopher Klaus (May 27)
- Security FAQes Update Christopher Klaus (May 27)
- Re: Request for discussion. Silicon Avatar (Feb 09)
- X authentication Timothy Newsham (Feb 09)
- Re: X authentication Stephen Gildea (Feb 10)
- Semaphores/Setuid root... problem? Pete Hartman (Feb 09)