Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question.
From: hoodr () hoodr slip netcom com (hoodr () hoodr slip netcom com)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 1994 19:37:14 +0000
If I recall correctly, (I could be wrong), was the original discussion about sudo? If so, why not statically link it? (I'm not discounting the importance of the LD_* problem).
Thats not the problem. Sudo is setuid, so the LD_* variables are ignored anyway. The problem is that sudo executes other programs as root, without clearing the environment variables. Since the other programs are NOT suid, they WILL listed to the LD_* variables.
Current thread:
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. hoodr () hoodr slip netcom com (Dec 02)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Rens Troost (Dec 03)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Pat Myrto (Dec 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. jim () Tadpole COM (Dec 02)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Ken Descoteaux (Dec 05)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Casper Dik (Dec 06)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Doug Hughes (Dec 05)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Bonfield James (Dec 06)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Todd C. Miller (Dec 06)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Bonfield James (Dec 06)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. hoodr () hoodr slip netcom com (Dec 05)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. James R. Ault (Dec 06)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Pat Myrto (Dec 07)
- AOL Provided Programs Michael S. Hines (Dec 07)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Rens Troost (Dec 03)