Bugtraq mailing list archives
full disclosure list clarification
From: pwh () bradley bradley edu (Pete Hartman)
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 16:19:06 -0600
I've gotten more than a few replies that didn't quite understand my intentions in the last post (about possibly setting up a list to discuss the issues of disclosure). I guess I was unclear; let me try to clarify: At this point I am only looking for responses from people who want to PARTICIPATE in *discussion* about the pro's & con's of various levels of disclosure in security announcements. If you want the discussion off of bugtraq, but don't want to participate yourself, don't bother telling me about it, because I'm only trying to gauge likely levels of participation (if I don't have enough people interested in actually DISCUSSING, I'm not going to bother). I'd just as soon see it off bugtraq too, that's why I'm doing this, but if no one actually wants to do the talking on the other list, there's no point. Please also note that I am *not* proposing to create an alternate mailing list for ACTUAL DISCLOSURE. That's what bugtraq is for, and I am in no way proposing to replace that. Have a nice day. :-)
Current thread:
- Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Christopher Klaus (Nov 30)
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Casper Dik (Dec 02)
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Christopher Klaus (Dec 02)
- RE: Question... CUNNINGHAM () B PSC EDU (Dec 02)
- empty messages? Breakdown (Dec 02)
- Re: empty messages? Walker Aumann (Dec 02)
- /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. That Whispering Wolf... (Dec 02)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. anthony baxter (Dec 03)
- Re: /dev/tcp, and a LD_LIBRARY_PATH question. Robert M. Haas (Dec 03)
- full disclosure list clarification Pete Hartman (Dec 02)
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Casper Dik (Dec 02)
- pt_chmod carson () lehman com (Dec 02)
- Re: pt_chmod Karl Strickland (Dec 02)
- mktemp.. *Hobbit* (Dec 02)
- bugtraq list problems (resolved?) Admin/Support (Dec 02)
- full-disclosure list Pete Hartman (Dec 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Christopher Klaus (Dec 03)
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Bela Lubkin (Dec 03)
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Karl Strickland (Dec 04)
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Paul 'Shag' Walmsley (Dec 04)
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Christopher Klaus (Dec 04)
- Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof: Karl Strickland (Dec 04)