Security Basics mailing list archives
Transparent vs Routed Firewall
From: Alex <alex.tsr () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:19:52 +0200
Hello List, I'm in the task of setting up a Cisco ASA to protect some internal servers. I was thinking of configuring it to be transparent (aka layer 2, bridged etc.) rather than routed (aka layer 3). From what I've read there are some advantages to this, such as ease of deployment, less load, etc. The reason I was thinking of going the transparent way is that it "feels" more like a firewall to me, forget the routings, NAT, QOS and focus on filtering and some intrusion prevention. Is there a reason I should/shouldn't choose this configuration? -- Cheers, Alex. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate. We look at how SSL works, how it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase, install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates. http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442f727d1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Transparent vs Routed Firewall Alex (Feb 04)
- Re: Transparent vs Routed Firewall Chris Brenton (Feb 05)
- Re: Transparent vs Routed Firewall John Morrison (Feb 08)
- Re: Transparent vs Routed Firewall Alex (Feb 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Transparent vs Routed Firewall Chris Brenton (Feb 10)
- Re: Transparent vs Routed Firewall Chris Brenton (Feb 05)