Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Third Party Patch Management
From: chmod1777 () invalid-host name
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:31:05 -0600
There probably isn't much for a company that size, for a client/server solution. Best bet would probably be to script them. SMS/LanDesk/Alteris/etc are just not economically viable when you're talking about that number of pc's. Once you're at >500 workstations then those alternatives start making sense. Kurt ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: InfoSec Institute Learn all of the latest penetration testing techniques in InfoSec Institute's Ethical Hacking class. Totally hands-on course with evening Capture The Flag (CTF) exercises, Certified Ethical Hacker and Certified Penetration Tester exams, taught by an expert with years of real pen testing experience. http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Third Party Patch Management Al Cooper (Mar 24)
- Re: Third Party Patch Management Noah . Lance (Mar 25)
- Re: Third Party Patch Management badz (Mar 25)
- Re: Third Party Patch Management fac51 (Mar 25)
- Re: Third Party Patch Management τ∂υƒιφ * (Mar 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Third Party Patch Management chmod1777 (Mar 24)
- Re: Third Party Patch Management Phil Bieber (Mar 25)
- Re: Third Party Patch Management krymson (Mar 25)
- Re: Re: Third Party Patch Management chmod1777 (Mar 26)
- Re: Third Party Patch Management aaaa (Mar 26)
- Re: Third Party Patch Management Phil Bieber (Mar 27)
- Re: Third Party Patch Management krymson (Mar 27)