Security Basics mailing list archives
R: SSL and IPSec appliance
From: "Vega - Brunello Ivan" <I.Brunello () vegaspa it>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:03:43 +0100
I've experienced several problems with ASA. Either you use 7.x OS version, which is good (as always has been on IPSec), but a little less flexible on SSL, or you switch to 8.x, which is INCREDIBLE on SSL, but gave me nothing but problems on IPSec. BTW, Cisco are my VPN devices of choice, and their VPN support (and expecially their DEBUG features) has always been very good (except, of course, what stated before). I was told that Juniper/Netscreen could reach higher performance (notably, the Juniper devices have custom processors, while most of ASA's horsepower is based on plain Intel processors), but I don't have direct hands-on experience. Ivan Brunello System & Network Management
-----Messaggio originale----- Da: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] Per conto di Alasdair Gow Inviato: mercoledì 29 ottobre 2008 15.53 A: Ivan . Cc: security-basics () securityfocus com Oggetto: Re: SSL and IPSec appliance Hi, Have you considered the Cisco ASA range? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/ I find them very flexible in terms of client less vpn and ipsec and also you can can vpn over SSL with the anyconnect client too. Kind regards, Ally Ivan . wrote:Hi, I am looking for some advice on appliances that support both client-less SSL and IPSec tunneling VPNs. I have been evaluated the Juniper SA range and they have great features on the SSL side, but do not support IPSec tunneling. Any advice or experiences with our kit is appreciated Thanks Ivan
Current thread:
- SSL and IPSec appliance Ivan . (Oct 29)
- Re: SSL and IPSec appliance Alasdair Gow (Oct 29)
- R: SSL and IPSec appliance Vega - Brunello Ivan (Oct 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re: SSL and IPSec appliance secuirtyfocus (Oct 29)
- Re: Re: Re: SSL and IPSec appliance stcroix111 (Oct 31)
- Re: SSL and IPSec appliance Alasdair Gow (Oct 29)