Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: RE: Port scan and scvhost overload
From: robbie_b_ () hotmail com
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:34:15 -0600
192.168 are internalips. having said that, dont you think your pushing this a lil far? everybody is entitled to their privacy and you intend to break that because a firewall reports a portscan? Ever considered false positives? And there are allways several scvhosts running in the process list.
Current thread:
- Port scan and scvhost overload reporting4booty (Oct 16)
- RE: Port scan and scvhost overload Prodigi Child (Oct 16)
- RE: Port scan and scvhost overload Murda Mcloud (Oct 17)
- RE: Port scan and scvhost overload Prodigi Child (Oct 17)
- RE: Port scan and scvhost overload Richard Golodner (Oct 17)
- Re: Port scan and scvhost overload Salvador III Manaois (Oct 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RE: Port scan and scvhost overload robbie_b_ (Oct 17)
- Re: Re: RE: Port scan and scvhost overload reporting4booty (Oct 17)
- Re: Re: RE: Port scan and scvhost overload Salvador III Manaois (Oct 20)