Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule
From: Adriel Desautels <adriel () netragard com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:59:32 -0400
Philippe,I disagree with you and I think that the definition of security that you provided is partial, but thats just my opinion. Availability is a vague term that can, but does not always have a role in security. Determining what the proper schedule is for a drive replacement policy is something that can be done by IT without the security team. Deciding how to dispose of the drives on the other hand is security.
Regards, Adriel T. Desautels Chief Technology Officer Netragard, LLC. Office : 617-934-0269 Mobile : 617-633-3821 http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/118/a45 Join the Netragard, LLC. Linked In Group: http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/48683/0B98E1705142 --------------------------------------------------------------- Netragard, LLC - http://www.netragard.com - "We make IT Safe" Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Assessments, Website Security Netragard Whitepaper Downloads: ------------------------------- Choosing the right provider : http://tinyurl.com/2ahk3j Three Things you must know : http://tinyurl.com/26pjsn Rivest, Philippe wrote:
Adriel & Murda It is a security issue the way you store your data. In regards to the raid technologies, raid 5 improves the availability of the data by making surethat a single drive failed will not impact the availability of the data. Remember that security is 1- Confidentiality2- Availability 3- Integrity The main goal of a Raid 5 is to help #2. You are referring to the disposal of the HD which is the issue of confidentiality and that is not what Murda was aiming at. If it is, go for encryption, degaussing, destruction and just plain format (if the data is not confidential). As I explained to him offline, the MTTF and MTBF is about the same for 2 HD bought/constructed at about the same time. How ever, those are not absolute numbers that state that, if one drive fails the other one is about to go too. It's more an estimated value against which you should have some confidence/hope, your drive should not fail before X hours (it could go before but the average is X). In a raid 5, Drive A, B and C are online and working (they are the same drive bought at the same time). Drive A fails, you should NOT change drive B & C unless they are failing also. If you do, the cost of your raid 5 will be greater then what it should be (the replacing of the parts are going to cost a lot). Change drive A and hope drives B & C will last longer. The only issue is that 2 drives fail at the same time, which is very improbable. And if it does, you should be going for your back ups. I do hope this clarified the questions and that I wasn't to unclear with my details! Merci / Thanks Philippe Rivest, CEH Vérificateur interne en sécurité de l'information Courriel: Privest () transforce ca Téléphone: (514) 331-4417 www.transforce.ca -----Message d'origine----- De : listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] De la part de Adriel Desautels Envoyé : 20 juin 2008 11:27 À : Murda Mcloud Cc : security-basics () securityfocus com Objet : Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule Murda,The real answer to your question is that it is very, very improbable that all of the drives in the array will fail at the same time. Most drives are good for a certain period of years, after which point you are getting "extra time".That is not a security issue though. That is an IT related issue. Thesecurity issue comes into play when you dispose of your drives. Do you shred them, just throw them in the dumpster, how do you dispose of them?Regards, Adriel T. Desautels Chief Technology Officer Netragard, LLC. Office : 617-934-0269 Mobile : 617-633-3821 http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/118/a45 Join the Netragard, LLC. Linked In Group: http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/48683/0B98E1705142 --------------------------------------------------------------- Netragard, LLC - http://www.netragard.com - "We make IT Safe" Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Assessments, Website Security Netragard Whitepaper Downloads: ------------------------------- Choosing the right provider : http://tinyurl.com/2ahk3j Three Things you must know : http://tinyurl.com/26pjsn Murda Mcloud wrote:In my mind, this a security related question as it has to do with ensuring availability. Does anyone have links towards any whitepapers etc that suggest replacement of disks in a RAID 5 array as part of a maintenance cycle? If all the drives in an array are the same age and one fails; does thismeanthe others are more likely to fail. I'd imagine so as they have had thesameamount of usage.
Current thread:
- RAID 5 drive replacement schedule Murda Mcloud (Jun 20)
- Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule Adriel Desautels (Jun 20)
- RE: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule Rivest, Philippe (Jun 20)
- Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule Adriel Desautels (Jun 20)
- Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule Mike Hale (Jun 20)
- Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule Adriel Desautels (Jun 20)
- Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule Mike Hale (Jun 20)
- Was Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule - Now "Availability" Adriel Desautels (Jun 20)
- Re: Was Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule - Now "Availability" Mike Hale (Jun 20)
- RE: Was Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule - Now "Availability" Nick Vaernhoej (Jun 23)
- Re: Was Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule - Now "Availability" Mike Hale (Jun 23)
- RE: Was Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule - Now "Availability" Murda Mcloud (Jun 24)
- RE: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule Rivest, Philippe (Jun 20)
- Re: Was Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule - Now "Availability" Adriel Desautels (Jun 23)
- Re: Was Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule - Now "Availability" Mike Hale (Jun 23)
- Re: RAID 5 drive replacement schedule Adriel Desautels (Jun 20)