Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Remote Branch reconfiguration
From: "Lee Hilt" <lhilt () mbc edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:38:16 -0500
Very true, I apologize. Failed to read the following : Note The PIX 501, PIX 506/506E, and PIX 520 security appliances are not supported in software Version 7.2(2). //l -----Original Message----- From: mgaysek () comcast net [mailto:mgaysek () comcast net] Sent: 2008-01-30 11:20 To: Lee Hilt; 'Jon'; security-basics () securityfocus com; vpn () securityfocus com; firewalls () securityfocus com Subject: RE: Remote Branch reconfiguration 7.2 is not available for Pix 501 or 506. The latest is 6.3(5) for a 501. If you perform a show version you license limits should be listed. IE: --snip begin -- Encryption hardware device : VAC+ (Crypto5823 revision 0x1) 0: ethernet0: address is 000f.3454.f7e0, irq 10 1: ethernet1: address is 000f.3454.f7e1, irq 11 2: ethernet2: address is 000d.8811.1a48, irq 11 3: ethernet3: address is 000d.8811.1a49, irq 10 4: ethernet4: address is 000d.8811.1a4a, irq 9 5: ethernet5: address is 000d.8811.1a4b, irq 5 Licensed Features: Failover: Enabled VPN-DES: Enabled VPN-3DES-AES: Enabled Maximum Physical Interfaces: 6 Maximum Interfaces: 10 Cut-through Proxy: Enabled Guards: Enabled URL-filtering: Enabled Inside Hosts: Unlimited Throughput: Unlimited IKE peers: Unlimited ---snip end -- The IKE peers is what your are looking for. -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Lee Hilt" <lhilt () mbc edu>
In 6.1 and 6.2, the relevant limit is 5. In 6.3 the limit became 10. *from google search* this information leads me to believe that the situation is possible. What I would do is simply pull the configs from the old PIX 501 (do a show run, find the relavent entries, paste them into a txt file and then into the headend pix.) To do this I would simply follow this document: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configu ration _example09186a00807d287e.shtml also, make sure to updatre to version 7.2 IOS. Many bug fixes in this release. -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Jon Sent: 2008-01-29 5:21 To: security-basics () securityfocus com; vpn () securityfocus com; firewalls () securityfocus com Subject: Remote Branch reconfiguration Hello, /First of all apologies if this is the wrong list./ I have, or rather had a few site to site vpn's set up. This is not my setup, but rather its inherited . I have two remote branches terminating on one pix at the head office and another vpn terminating on a different pix, also at the head office. On these tunnels I pass RDP traffic aimed at a Term server. From the termserver, there is a seperate route out to the internet for all hosts. The models of pix are 501's. I am led to believe that you can only have a maximum of two tunnels terminating on any one 501 firewall. I presume this is why two 501's were used. Now to my issue: For reasons best left unsaid, the adsl line on the pix with only one site to site vpn configured has had the line cancelled. This is causing me a lot of grief from a customer and bearing in mind I dont know that much about cisco configs I am at a bit of a loss of how to get the third and presently cancelled remote branch securely connected to my head end. Would it be possible to configure an access list on the pix that allows RDP traffic from the remote site - if so, then how? I have an Internet connection available to me at the remote branch, I just need to know the best way to integrate into the only available pix that is remaining. To summarise: Remote Branch A & VPN Head END PIX 1 Remote Branch B Remote Branch C VPN Head END PIX 2 (Now Cancelled) Possible: Remote Branch C RDP (3389) Head END PIX 1 All the Pix's are 501's. Trm Server is Windows 2000. Clients are XP. I hope this makes sense - any help much appreciated. Regards J
Current thread:
- Remote Branch reconfiguration Jon (Jan 29)
- RE: Remote Branch reconfiguration Lee Hilt (Jan 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Remote Branch reconfiguration mgaysek (Jan 30)
- RE: Remote Branch reconfiguration Lee Hilt (Jan 30)