Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss

From: "David Gillett" <gillettdavid () fhda edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:03:05 -0700

I am looking for a solution with which i can permanently show 
a different IP adress! (not actual)


  It's called NAT -- Network Address Translation.  All of the appearance
of anonymity with none of the benefits.

David Gillett

Current thread:

Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 13)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Utmost Bastard (Sep 13)
  - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 13)
    - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Utmost Bastard (Sep 13)
    - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 13)
    - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 14)
    - RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss David Gillett (Sep 14)
    - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Dotzero (Sep 14)
    - Message not available
    - RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 18)
    - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 18)
    - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 18)
    - RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 18)
    - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Rohin Koul (Sep 26)
    - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 26)
    - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 27)
    - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 27)
    - Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss gjgowey (Sep 28)

(Thread continues...)