Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: NAT external/Public IP
From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <bugtraq () planetcobalt net>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:58:20 +0100
On 2007-10-29 Grant Donald wrote:
There's a real security benefit in using PAT for internet access from staff PC's. Any alternative is most definitely less secure.
I keep seeing this claim being made. Yet I fail to see anyone giving evidence to support it. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches becoming available." --Jason Coombs on Bugtraq
Current thread:
- NAT external/Public IP smarts_buy (Oct 24)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP crazy frog crazy frog (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 25)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Jason Alexander (Oct 25)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Eric Furman (Oct 25)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Jason Alexander (Oct 26)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Grant Donald (Oct 29)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 29)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Michael Painter (Oct 30)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Grant Donald (Oct 30)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 30)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Security Incidents (Oct 30)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP crazy frog crazy frog (Oct 31)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Dan Lynch (Oct 31)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP crazy frog crazy frog (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Chris Barber (Oct 25)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Nick Vaernhoej (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Brett (Oct 25)