Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Network protocol analyzers
From: "Michael R. Martinez" <mike () security-bounce com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:39:20 +0000
Packetyzer is a good free protocol analyzer for windows. I prefer wire shark, but packetyzer is good too. Mike Michael R. Martinez TF: 800-987-7307 -----Original Message----- From: "Malhoit, Lauren" <Lauren.Malhoit () tylertech com> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:22:43 To:"security-basics" <security-basics () securityfocus com> Subject: Network protocol analyzers I'm using Wireshark (used to be ethereal). Does anyone know any better protocol analyzers? Preferably open source. If you like Wireshark, why do you like it? -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Nick Vaernhoej Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 7:41 PM To: security-basics Subject: RE: Securing workstations from IT guys A key logger? At what point are we crossing the line of common decency towards co-workers? I realize it is company property and all, but if you log access to sensitive files and audit these logs do you really need to be more intrusive? This is not an attack, more a tagged on question to everyone? Is keystroke logging commonly accepted by you? Nick Vaernhoej "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Vandenberg, Robert Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:18 AM To: security-basics Subject: RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Those are good points. I would recommend that you put in a keystroke logger program with the written approval of your upper management on the PCs in question and then download the logs each day. That way you are able to create a forensics "e-Trail" that can be used to confront/counsel/etc. them. I would also make sure that you look at your documenation and ensure that each IT person has signed a document stating that they will not use their abilities improperly. Combine those two and you have a means of pursuing them legally. This electronic transmission is intended for the addressee (s) named above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copy, or dissemination of this transmission or the taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender that this message was received in error and then delete this message. Thank you.
Current thread:
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys, (continued)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Depp, Dennis M. (Nov 27)
- Re: Securing workstations from IT guys Liam Jewell (Nov 27)
- Re: Securing workstations from IT guys Mark Owen (Nov 27)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Erin Carroll (Nov 27)
- Re: Securing workstations from IT guys Christian Brenner (Nov 27)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Holtz,Robert (Nov 27)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Depp, Dennis M. (Nov 27)
- Re: Securing workstations from IT guys Micheal Espinola Jr (Nov 29)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Nick Vaernhoej (Nov 28)
- Network protocol analyzers Malhoit, Lauren (Nov 28)
- Re: Network protocol analyzers Michael R. Martinez (Nov 28)
- RE: Network protocol analyzers Chris Boczko (Nov 28)
- Re: Network protocol analyzers crazy frog crazy frog (Nov 28)