Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: RE: FUD - was FAX a virus
From: krymson () gmail com
Date: 7 Mar 2007 16:14:25 -0000
Man, someone call in the panic attack ambulance... Before you start making more of an ass of yourself and keep putting on the blinders about fax vulnerability vectors, maybe you should present your challenges about proving you wrong to forums other than "security-basics." Perhaps throw that into pen-test or even Full Disclosure. You might get better answers. Is it a huge deal that we should be throwing our hands in the air about? I heavily doubt it. But you don't have to come unglued and then start posting distracting lectures about SQL Injections and DB holes. No one is arguing those or that faxes are the next big thing.
Current thread:
- RE: FUD - was FAX a virus, (continued)
- RE: FUD - was FAX a virus Scott Ramsdell (Mar 06)
- Re: FUD - was FAX a virus TheGesus (Mar 06)
- RE: FUD - was FAX a virus Craig Wright (Mar 06)
- RE: FUD - was FAX a virus Craig Wright (Mar 06)
- Re: FUD - was FAX a virus Robert Wesley McGrew (Mar 07)
- RE: FUD - was FAX a virus Peter Denyer (Mar 07)
- Re: FUD - was FAX a virus Robert Wesley McGrew (Mar 07)
- RE: FUD - was FAX a virus Bob Radvanovsky (Mar 06)
- RE: FUD - was FAX a virus Craig Wright (Mar 07)
- RE: FUD - was FAX a virus Craig Wright (Mar 07)
- Re: FUD - was FAX a virus Robert Wesley McGrew (Mar 07)
- Re: RE: FUD - was FAX a virus krymson (Mar 07)
- RE: RE: FUD - was FAX a virus Craig Wright (Mar 07)