Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: PCI, EFS and the future?
From: Sean Waddell <swaddell () espgroup net>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:50:13 -0500
Brandon just setup a zabbix server on our stack 2 here to monitor the wellpoint server as well as go out and monitor our portals. I would suggest in the interim let's setup and monitor the 7 dr portals down there....that would at least tell us if there is network connectivity. Once we can get a zabbix monitor down there we can have it monitor the router etc. Sean Waddell Director of Operations The ESP Group LLC 703.418.6314 Craig Wright wrote:
Let assume that the datbase is a standard one such as Oracle or SQL. The database is loaded into the systems memory decrypted. EFS does not encrypt database tables. It may encrypt the ENTIRE file, but when the database is live it is loaded Unencrypted. EFS is thus not the be all and end all for PCI requirements. Next, EFS does nothing to help with ensuring backups are secure on tape. It does nothing to secure the network or internal system transfers. The idea is that there is no cut and dry solution out of the box. It is something that requires thought. Craig -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Saqib Ali Sent: Saturday, 3 February 2007 9:14 AM To: Nick Vaernhoej Cc: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Re: PCI, EFS and the future?My gut feeling is telling me that EFS is the wrong solution and I fear that it won't be in compliance with PCI's data at rest specs.May I ask why you feel that EFS is the wrong solution? On the face, it seems to satisfy all the PCI data storage encryption requirements .... I will tell you more why EFS might not be a good idea, but I want to hear your opinion first. Here is some white-papers (disclaimer: they are self-serving, but still good) that cover data storage requirements for PCI. http://www.neoscale.com/English/Solutions/Whitepapers.html Also check out http://www.decru.com/ saqib http://www.full-disk-encryption.net Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation in respect of matters arising within those States and Territories of Australia where such legislation exists. DISCLAIMER The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use or disclose the information. If you have received this email in error, please inform us promptly by reply email or by telephoning +61 2 9286 5555. Please delete the email and destroy any printed copy. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. You may not rely on this message as advice unless it has been electronically signed by a Partner of BDO or it is subsequently confirmed by letter or fax signed by a Partner of BDO. BDO accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or unauthorised access.
Current thread:
- PCI, EFS and the future? Nick Vaernhoej (Feb 02)
- RE: PCI, EFS and the future? Roger A. Grimes (Feb 05)
- Re: PCI, EFS and the future? Saqib Ali (Feb 05)
- RE: PCI, EFS and the future? Nick Vaernhoej (Feb 05)
- RE: PCI, EFS and the future? Gressick, Michael (Feb 07)
- RE: PCI, EFS and the future? dave kleiman (Feb 05)
- Message not available
- RE: PCI, EFS and the future? Nick Vaernhoej (Feb 05)
- RE: PCI, EFS and the future? Dan Anderson (Feb 19)
- RE: PCI, EFS and the future? Nick Vaernhoej (Feb 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PCI, EFS and the future? Nick Vaernhoej (Feb 05)
- Re: PCI, EFS and the future? Craig Wright (Feb 06)
- Re: PCI, EFS and the future? Sean Waddell (Feb 06)
- Re: PCI, EFS and the future? Saqib Ali (Feb 07)
- CastleCops 5-Year Anniversary and Contest dave kleiman (Feb 08)
- Re: PCI, EFS and the future? Sean Waddell (Feb 06)
- RE: PCI, EFS and the future? Dan Anderson (Feb 19)