Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: terminal server security vs vpn
From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <bugtraq () planetcobalt net>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:54:37 +0200
On 2007-08-14 Brent Kern wrote:
We went through this at our government agency and the remote desktop client is 128bit encrypted.
Without knowing the encryption algorithm that doesn't mean anything. At all. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches becoming available." --Jason Coombs on Bugtraq
Current thread:
- terminal server security vs vpn Juan B (Aug 13)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Chris Barber (Aug 13)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Brent Kern (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Aug 14)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Chandresh Dedhia (Aug 14)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Brent Kern (Aug 14)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Beauford, Jason (Aug 13)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Deno Vichas (Aug 13)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Mngadi, Simphiwe (SS) (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Isaac Perez (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Brian Loe (Aug 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn abhicc285 (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn nobledark (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Chris Barber (Aug 13)