Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: spam-filtering policy
From: "Thomas Choi" <tchoi () nortel com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:33:39 -0500
cc wrote:
Since there's no 100% effective spam filtering mechanisms so far, is it 'effective' to block (every/some) domains/IPs and have the admin of those domains/IPs send an online application to whitelist the domains/IPs?
IMO, it depends on: 1. How they determined that your domain/IP was considered a spam source.-Are they using un-maintained blacklists or are they being extremely aggressive?
2. How you were notified that there is a problem.-Did you receive a bounce e-mail? If so, this is a really bad way of notifying the user of this situation. Why? Because most spam is forged!
3. How long it took to resolve the problem.-If the turnaround time is longer than a day or two and requires a non-trivial amount of work from both parties to resolve the issue then I think there's a problem with their processes.
Current thread:
- spam-filtering policy cc (Dec 13)
- Re: spam-filtering policy Frynge Customer Support (Dec 13)
- Re: spam-filtering policy Mike Peppard (Dec 14)
- Re: spam-filtering policy Micheal Espinola Jr (Dec 15)
- Re: spam-filtering policy Thomas Choi (Dec 21)
- Re: spam-filtering policy Micheal Espinola Jr (Dec 25)
- Re: spam-filtering policy Devdas Bhagat (Dec 18)
- Re: spam-filtering policy Thomas Choi (Dec 21)