Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: nmap scan results
From: Alvin Oga <alvin.sec () Virtual Linux-Sec net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 17:26:47 -0800
hi ya ju On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:37:37PM -0600, Ju Ne wrote:
I have been unhappy with many of the port scanners out there and Im just starting to learn the power of nmap.
which ones did you use .. what features/functions were you looking for there's not much one can do about port scanning to give you "unhappy results" rest of the port scanners http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Scanner/ online port scanners http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Audit/nmap.test.gwif.html
Ive been reviewing nmap scan results on my network. If a port comes back as filtered does that mean that it is open, closed, firewalled, or just unknown?
depending on the site ... it can be firewalled or closed or unknown i'm assuming you're port scanning a machine you are legally authorized to be scanning ( ie your own machines from outside of that target machine ) c ya alvin
Current thread:
- nmap scan results Ju Ne (Mar 18)
- Re: nmap scan results Steven DeFord (Mar 21)
- Re: nmap scan results Geoff Scott (Mar 21)
- Re: nmap scan results Jacob Bresciani (Mar 21)
- Re: nmap scan results Mark Owen (Mar 21)
- Re: nmap scan results Alvin Oga (Mar 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: nmap scan results Ivan Coric (Mar 21)