Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: RPC over HTTP security
From: Kevin Conaway <kevin.conaway () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:02:07 -0500
What security concerns do you have? If you're worried about someone sniffing the traffic, simply going over HTTPS should do the trick. Depending on what language you're using, there might be better options than RPC for what you're trying to accomplish. Kevin On 26 Jan 2005 13:02:40 -0000, sf_mail_sbm () yahoo com <sf_mail_sbm () yahoo com> wrote:
Hi List, We are thinking about deploying RPC over HTTP to access email from the Internet Wanted to get some information on the technology and the security implications of same Not much info from Microsoft's site any help would be greatly apreciated Thanks, Ronish
Current thread:
- RPC over HTTP security sf_mail_sbm (Jan 26)
- Re: RPC over HTTP security Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Jan 27)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Shawn Wall (Jan 27)
- Re: RPC over HTTP security Presley, Steven (Jan 27)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Sarbjit Singh Gill (Jan 27)
- Re: RPC over HTTP security Kevin Conaway (Jan 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Roger A. Grimes (Jan 27)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Michael B. Morell (Jan 27)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security LordInfidel (Jan 27)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Robert Hines (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Kevin Doheny (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Paris E. Stone (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Price, Robert H (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Eric McCarty (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Shawn Wall (Jan 28)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Sarbjit Singh Gill (Jan 31)
- RE: RPC over HTTP security Shawn Wall (Jan 28)
(Thread continues...)