Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: TCP/IP CRC question
From: "David Gillett" <gillettdavid () fhda edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:07:09 -0700
1. The upper-layer protocols are end-to-end; the link layer gets rebuilt with every hop. 2. The FCS is allowed to be left as zero by the sender, and/or ignored by the recipient. David Gillett
-----Original Message----- From: Jorge Mendez Bonini [mailto:jlmb () cableonda net] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 11:15 PM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: TCP/IP CRC question I've been reading about the TCP/IP protocol stack (TCP/Ilustrated Vol1 by Richard Stevens) lately and since Ethernet is quite common nowadays almost all link layer examples refer to it (I also checked Douglas Comer Internetworking with TCP/IP vol1). I tried searching RFC but found it very time consuming without good results (maybe I'm not used to it...yet) The Ethernet Frame contains a field known as FCS which contains a CRC. Now, my question is: If the CRC is generated from DATA field among others, What's the point of using checksums on the upper protocolos (IP checksums etc..)? Thanks for your time.
Current thread:
- TCP/IP CRC question Jorge Mendez Bonini (Oct 06)
- RE: TCP/IP CRC question David Gillett (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Jonathan Loh (Oct 07)
- RE: TCP/IP CRC question Shaineel Singh (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Alex V . Lukyanenko (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Fernando Gont (Oct 07)
- RE: TCP/IP CRC question Shaineel Singh (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Fernando Gont (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Miles Stevenson (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Miles Stevenson (Oct 08)
- RE: TCP/IP CRC question Clement Dupuis (Oct 12)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Miles Stevenson (Oct 08)
(Thread continues...)