Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: False negative on anti sniffing programme.
From: captgoodnight () acsalaska net
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:45:06 -0800
On Thursday 17 June 2004 07:03 am, asharma () ita hsr ch wrote:
folowed the approach of sending arp request packets to the IP of the machine with the arp address resembling but not equal to a broadcast address . I am receiving good responses from most of test runs, however some linux based machines - with Kernel 2.4.20-8 and 2.4.18 seem to responding to these packets despite not being in promiscuous mode. I fail to understand why this should be possible. Your comments would be invaluable.
Just got done working on this. The best info I found on the subject was from this pdf. http://securityfriday.com/promiscuous_detection_01.pdf I personally use http://www.habets.pp.se/synscan/programs.php The syntax I use is ./arping -s 00:50:2C:08:97:F0 -S 192.168.0.4 -t FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FE xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ^src mac ^src ip ^bad brdcst ^target Works like a charm. As the unexpected results your having, read page 13 of the pdf. It mentions some 3com nics and unexpected results. This may be the issue; there's a solution. Also, decoys are a sneaky way to detect baddies too. I use netcat to throw PASS/USER decoy packets out on the network. If I see these in the logs where there not supposed to be, then there's a issue. I hope that helps. captgoodnight --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- False negative on anti sniffing programme. asharma (Jun 18)
- Re: False negative on anti sniffing programme. captgoodnight (Jun 21)
- Re: False negative on anti sniffing programme. Ranjeet Shetye (Jun 23)
- Re: False negative on anti sniffing programme. captgoodnight (Jun 21)