Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: MBSA 1.2
From: "Mike" <mike () superiorholidayadventures ca>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:34:41 -0500
Both Nessus and HFNetChk have very good reporting (for free tools). Mike Fetherston
Which tool has a robust set of reporting features in relation to
multiple
Windows hosts and their patches? On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 10:54:54AM -0500, Mike wrote:I don't believe that Nessus scans for the presence of Windows
patches.
It's more of a general tool that looks for vulnerabilities in
services
offered. It also looks at general configuration problems that can
be
detected over a network link. I don't believe that it can inspect
the
registry or look at the filesystem. Take a look at HFNetChk or
MSBSA
for those purposes. I find Nessus to be a very good complement to these tools when performing security scans as it will uncover issues that HFNetChk or MSBSA don't even look for and vice versa, HFN and BSA look at items
that
Nessus can't/won't.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Free trial: Astaro Security Linux -- firewall with Spam/Virus Protection Protect your network with the comprehensive security solution that integrates six applications for ease of use and lower TCO. Firewall - Virus protection - Spam protection - URL blocking - VPN - Wireless security. Download 30-day evaluation at: http://www.astaro.com/php/contact/securityfocus.php ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: MBSA 1.2 Mike (Feb 13)
- Re: MBSA 1.2 ~Kevin DavisĀ³ (Feb 16)
- Re: MBSA 1.2 Todd (Feb 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: MBSA 1.2 Mike (Feb 16)
- RE: MBSA 1.2 Mike (Feb 16)