Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: arpwatch
From: "ted koenig" <tkoenig () lf-mail com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:43:19 -0400
I would think the only real purpose of doing arpwatch is to prevent apr, arp poison routing, and on a network of any major size/traffic volume you will notice a significant slowdown if somebody is up to that. Basically it effectively turns a switched network into a hubbed one by making everyone route through one machine, so that guy can sniff stuff out. For the most part, switches hamper the average sniffer. Ted Koenig LaFrance Corp. Network Administrator -----Original Message----- From: John T. Hollyoak [mailto:john () mail isc rit edu] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:05 PM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Re: arpwatch Tomas / Zidan, I just wanted to respond and add some information and ask a few questions.... a) What switches (that you are aware of) leak? Do you have any other information about this? links? b) port mirroring or a monitor port, is the way to go. Check out the monitor command on the cisco switches, for an example of how to do this. Basically maps a range of ports, to a single port, for the purposes of monitoring (i've actually used it for an IDS before). c) Using a tool within the Dsniff package, called "macof" ... this can be accomplished, simply by blasting the CAM table (Content Addressable Memory) with alot of addresses. The device will either fail open, or fail closed... meaning the basically turn into one big collision domain (hub). arpwatch is partially useful, if you have a small network. Anything that has a constant amount of ARP requests/replies .... will just create alot of junk. What are you trying to accomplish by using ARPwatch? Perhaps there is a better tool available ..... John Hollyoak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tomas Wolf" <tomas () skip cz> To: "zidan" <zidan00 () fastmail fm> Cc: <security-basics () securityfocus com> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:33 AM Subject: Re: arpwatch
my 2c -- a) some switches horribly leak :-) b) port mirroring would be the best bet (managable switches necessary) c) some under heavy load work like hubs (flood it) good luck - T. zidan wrote:hello, I have recently installed arpwatch on one of our servers. I understood arpwatch "learns" arp replies, but since arp replies are destined to a specific MAC and this is a switched network, how can arpwatch see all arp replies ? -Z---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
-
Captus Networks Are you prepared for the next Sobig & Blaster? - Instantly Stop DoS/DDoS Attacks, Worms & Port Scans - Precisely Define and Implement Network Security - Automatically Control P2P, IM and Spam Traffic FIND OUT NOW - FREE Vulnerability Assessment Toolkit http://www.captusnetworks.com/ads/42.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Captus Networks Are you prepared for the next Sobig & Blaster? - Instantly Stop DoS/DDoS Attacks, Worms & Port Scans - Precisely Define and Implement Network Security - Automatically Control P2P, IM and Spam Traffic FIND OUT NOW - FREE Vulnerability Assessment Toolkit http://www.captusnetworks.com/ads/42.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Captus Networks Are you prepared for the next Sobig & Blaster? - Instantly Stop DoS/DDoS Attacks, Worms & Port Scans - Precisely Define and Implement Network Security - Automatically Control P2P, IM and Spam Traffic FIND OUT NOW - FREE Vulnerability Assessment Toolkit http://www.captusnetworks.com/ads/42.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- arpwatch zidan (Sep 10)
- Re: arpwatch Tomas Wolf (Sep 11)
- Re: arpwatch John T. Hollyoak (Sep 11)
- RE: arpwatch ted koenig (Sep 11)
- Re: arpwatch Mikkel Christensen (Sep 12)
- Re: arpwatch John T. Hollyoak (Sep 11)
- Re: arpwatch Tomas Wolf (Sep 11)
- Re: arpwatch Gunter Luyten (Sep 11)
- Re: arpwatch Gunter Luyten (Sep 11)
- RE: arpwatch Zachary Mutrux (Sep 11)
- Logical access controle to network segments and boxes MeaCulpa (Sep 11)
- Re: Logical access controle to network segments and boxes Tim Syratt (Sep 11)
- Logical access controle to network segments and boxes MeaCulpa (Sep 11)
- Re: arpwatch Mikkel Christensen (Sep 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Arpwatch J. Oquendo (Sep 11)
- RE: Arpwatch zidan (Sep 11)
- Re: arpwatch zidan (Sep 11)