Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: PIX firewall and ICMP


From: "Cat Thrasher" <isd607 () co santa-cruz ca us>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:15:01 -0700

Thanks for all the responses to my post. I am using NAT on my PIX, so the specific allow statements
are only valid if the trouble-shooting they are doing is to a specific host that has an outside address mapped to an 
inside address.
Thanks again for your replies. I have been looking on the Cisco site for help in doing an ACL for the PIX and ICMP but 
the problem again is that I am doing NAT. 

Cat

-----Original Message-----
From: John Hollyoak [mailto:mail () jhollyoak com]
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 10:03 AM
To: Cat Thrasher; Security-Basics (E-mail)
Subject: Re: PIX firewall and ICMP


Cat Thrasher,

Perhaps instead of using a permit ANY to ANY rule for ICMP traffic, you
could make the rules more granular, using specific IP's and ranges.  Have
people provide a valid justification as to why they need to propagate this
type of traffic over your PIX.  Our company has specific policies on ICMP
traffic, and you need to justify beyond a 'shadow of a doubt' why it is
worth the risk.

Just a thought...

John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cat Thrasher" <isd607 () co santa-cruz ca us>
To: "Security-Basics (E-mail)" <security-basics () securityfocus com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:21 PM
Subject: PIX firewall and ICMP


Please advise your opinions on my problem. I had a permit statement on the
PIX that would allow ICMP from any to any. Since being hit with Nachi, I
turned it off. I am being asked my policy on when it will be turned back on.
I have a rather large network and many "divisions" who work independently,
yet access the internet thru "my" PIX. They like to use ping when
trouble-shooting.
Can I get an opinion on whether or not I should turn this back on...
Thanks

Cat Thrasher
Network Support Analyst
County of Santa Cruz
831-454-5367
cat.thrasher () co santa-cruz ca us


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------




---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: