Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: Cisco Workaround


From: "David Gillett" <gillettdavid () fhda edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:39:53 -0700

  They have.  They've been amazingly responsive about providing fixed
code versions for some frighteningly-old equipment.  The *Workaround*
is just a quick and dirty fix for those who need some time to schedule 
the code upgrade installations.

David Gillett


-----Original Message-----
From: Ghaith Nasrawi [mailto:libero () aucegypt edu]
Sent: July 25, 2003 08:33
Cc: firewalls () securityfocus com; security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: Cisco Workaround


Well, my question is; what the hell if I was using any of these
protocols?? Didn't cisco think of that?? They should have suggested a
more decent solution.


./Ghaith
===============

Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday





-----Original Message-----
From: jamesworld () intelligencia com 
[mailto:jamesworld () intelligencia com]

Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 6:48 PM
To: Alvaro Gordon-Escobar
Cc: firewalls () securityfocus com; security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: Cisco Workaround

Alvaro,

No.  The protocol blocked by the access-list is protocol 53 
not protocol

TCP or protocol UDP port 53.

If you need further info, let me know,

-James



At 09:15 7/23/2003, Alvaro Gordon-Escobar wrote:
will this access list modification prevent my internal DNS 
server from 
updates to it self from my telco's DNS server?

access-list 101 deny 53 any any
access-list 101 deny 55 any any
access-list 101 deny 77 any any
access-list 101 deny 103 any any
!--- insert any other previously applied ACL entries here
!--- you must permit other protocols through to allow normal
!--- traffic -- previously defined permit lists will work
!--- or you may use the permit ip any any shown here
access-list 101 permit ip any any

Thanks in advance

~alvaro Escobar

-------------------------------------------------------------
----------
----
-------------------------------------------------------------
----------
-----


--------------------------------------------------------------
----------
---
--------------------------------------------------------------
----------
----


--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: